I've been analysing open-ended responses from the State of User Research 2025 survey, and one theme is emerging from the data:

Researchers are exhausted from constantly proving their value to business leaders who don't get it.

If you've heard these push-backs, you're not alone:

  • "We don't have time for research"

  • "We don't have the budget"

  • "We already know our users"

I've faced these challenges before.

Sometimes I thought I was the problem; maybe I wasn’t persuasive enough, not strategic enough, my work was not valuable enough.

But these three lessons changed everything.

One: influence happens in micro doses

Your stakeholders won't suddenly "see the light" because you delivered the perfect argument.

Persuasion isn't a moment.

It's a daily practice wrapped in slowly-building trust.

Small conversations. Consistent presence. Gentle persistence.

Two: They're humans with fears and needs

The people pushing back aren't villains.

They have pressures, KPIs, and delivery anxieties just like you.

When I stopped trying to convince them research was valuable and started uncovering their motivators, things shifted. Suddenly we were on the same team.

Three: Sometimes it's not you, it's them

This was tough to accept. You can’t persuade everyone.

Sometimes an organisation's user-centred maturity level is at a stage that no amount of brilliant strategy will land. And that's okay.

This is all to say that these challenges are surmountable.

(Side note: I'm doing this analysis manually so I can compare it with an AI-assisted approach.)

Next time: Let's address the elephant in the room: "Software developers don't have to prove their value. Why do UX researchers?"

If this resonated, would you forward it to one person who needs to read it?

— Tomi

Keep Reading